Intermittent Fasting (IF) continues to be a popular approach to weight loss. It’s not a new approach, and most of my comments HERE still hold up. Since that vid, a number of studies in humans have been done, and the effects have not been impressive. The study below, the largest to date, that ran 50 weeks, did not find major differences in weight loss, and other endpoints looked at.
I’m not ready to dismiss IF per se, as there’s still more questions then answers. In this case, in obese non-exercising people, a 5;2 IF protocol was not superior to calorie matched diet for weight loss. The next step would be comparing different IF protocols. For example, perhaps the 5:2 approach may not potentiate endocrine adaptation as well as other approaches, or maybe different protocols will be more effective for different populations. Fact is, we don’t have the answers at this time, and what exists for human studies small and or short term.
Also, what impact does IF have on performance or strength? Does a strength or physique athlete respond differently to IF than say an endurance athlete?
Bottom line at this time, find the approach you find most beneficial to your goals, but don’t fall for IF being a magical approach to fat loss, cuz it’s not.
Effects of intermittent and continuous calorie restriction on body weight and metabolism over 50 wk: a randomized controlled trial
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Volume 108, Issue 5, 1 November 2018, Pages 933–945,